UB-Logo Online MagazinUntergrund-Blättle

A Cypherpunk’s Manifesto | Untergrund-Blättle


Privacy in an open society requires cryptography A Cypherpunk’s Manifesto


Privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age. Privacy is not secrecy. A private matter is something one doesn't want the whole world to know, but a secret matter is something one doesn't want anybody to know. Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world.

Chaos Communication Camp 2007 in Finowfurt near Berlin, Germany.
Mehr Artikel
Mehr Artikel
Bild ansehen

Bild: Chaos Communication Camp 2007 in Finowfurt near Berlin, Germany. / Mutante (CC BY-SA 3.0 unported - cropped)

20. Juli 2004
5 min.
If two parties have some sort of dealings, then each has a memory of their interaction. Each party can speak about their own memory of this; how could anyone prevent it? One could pass laws against it, but the freedom of speech, even more than privacy, is fundamental to an open society; we seek not to restrict any speech at all. If many parties speak together in the same forum, each can speak to all the others and aggregate together knowledge about individuals and other parties. The power of electronic communications has enabled such group speech, and it will not go away merely because we might want it to.

Since we desire privacy, we must ensure that each party to a transaction have knowledge only of that which is directly necessary for that transaction. Since any information can be spoken of, we must ensure that we reveal as little as possible. In most cases personal identity is not salient. When I purchase a magazine at a store and hand cash to the clerk, there is no need to know who I am. When I ask my electronic mail provider to send and receive messages, my provider need not know to whom I am speaking or what I am saying or what others are saying to me; my provider only need know how to get the message there and how much I owe them in fees. When my identity is revealed by the underlying mechanism of the transaction, I have no privacy. I cannot here selectively reveal myself; I must always reveal myself.

Therefore, privacy in an open society requires anonymous transaction systems. Until now, cash has been the primary such system. An anonymous transaction system is not a secret transaction system. An anonymous system empowers individuals to reveal their identity when desired and only when desired; this is the essence of privacy.

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography. If I say something, I want it heard only by those for whom I intend it. If the content of my speech is available to the world, I have no privacy. To encrypt is to indicate the desire for privacy, and to encrypt with weak cryptography is to indicate not too much desire for privacy. Furthermore, to reveal one's identity with assurance when the default is anonymity requires the cryptographic signature.

We cannot expect governments, corporations, or other large, faceless organizations to grant us privacy out of their beneficence. It is to their advantage to speak of us, and we should expect that they will speak. To try to prevent their speech is to fight against the realities of information. Information does not just want to be free, it longs to be free. Information expands to fill the available storage space. Information is Rumor's younger, stronger cousin; Information is fleeter of foot, has more eyes, knows more, and understands less than Rumor.

We must defend our own privacy if we expect to have any. We must come together and create systems which allow anonymous transactions to take place. People have been defending their own privacy for centuries with whispers, darkness, envelopes, closed doors, secret handshakes, and couriers. The technologies of the past did not allow for strong privacy, but electronic technologies do.

We the Cypherpunks are dedicated to building anonymous systems. We are defending our privacy with cryptography, with anonymous mail forwarding systems, with digital signatures, and with electronic money.

Cypherpunks write code. We know that someone has to write software to defend privacy, and since we can't get privacy unless we all do, we're going to write it. We publish our code so that our fellow Cypherpunks may practice and play with it. Our code is free for all to use, worldwide. We don't much care if you don't approve of the software we write. We know that software can't be destroyed and that a widely dispersed system can't be shut down.

Cypherpunks deplore regulations on cryptography, for encryption is fundamentally a private act. The act of encryption, in fact, removes information from the public realm. Even laws against cryptography reach only so far as a nation's border and the arm of its violence. Cryptography will ineluctably spread over the whole globe, and with it the anonymous transactions systems that it makes possible.

For privacy to be widespread it must be part of a social contract. People must come and together deploy these systems for the common good. Privacy only extends so far as the cooperation of one's fellows in society. We the Cypherpunks seek your questions and your concerns and hope we may engage you so that we do not deceive ourselves. We will not, however, be moved out of our course because some may disagree with our goals.

The Cypherpunks are actively engaged in making the networks safer for privacy. Let us proceed together apace.


Eric Hughes

Related content...
The open-source movementOn Private Property of Immaterial Goods


- The following excerpt is part of the longer essay »Free Property — On Social Criticism in the Form of a Software Licence«.

Conflict, Leeds University 1986.
Profane Existance CollectiveAnarchy, Punk and Utopia


- To many readers of Profane Existance it must seem like the only strategy the PE collective has is to sell our records and to glorify viloence against the state, and hell, it’s partly true.

CSIRO (  - )
Open-Source-SoftwareDie 10 Irrtümer über freie Software


- Der Anwalt Dr. Till Jaeger klärte in einem Vortrag die zehn grössten Irrtümer bezüglich freier Software auf. Der Vortrag gehört zur Veranstaltungsreihe „Monsters of Law“ des Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.

Remotely hacking into prisons cell and gate control systems

02.01.2012 - Many prisons and jails use SCADA systems with PLCs to open and close doors. Using original and publically available exploits along with evaluating ...

„All the political parties are silent…“ - Rechtsextremistisch motivierte Morde in Ungarn

18.01.2016 - Am 12. Januar 2016 hat das oberste Gericht in Ungarn die lebenslangen Freiheitsstrafen von drei Rechtsextremisten bestätigt. Die drei Personen, die der ...

Dossier: Coronavirus
Nickolay Romensky
Get Encrypted

Aktueller Termin in Berlin

Café Schlürf

Hallo,heute wieder Kaffee und Kuchen im Schlürf gegen Spende, 12-18 Uhr.Spenden gehen an FLINTA*, die von Repressionen betroffen sind. Wenn ihrdrinnen sitzen möchtet: bei uns ist immer noch 2G. Bestellung unddraussen sitzen: keine ...

Donnerstag, 11. August 2022 - 12:00 Uhr

Regenbogencafe, Lausitzer Str. 22a, 10999 Berlin

Event in Berlin


Donnerstag, 11. August 2022
- 21:00 -

Badehaus Berlin

Revaler Straße 99

10245 Berlin

More content...

Der laute Frühling.
Vorheriger Artikel

Der laute Frühling. Gemeinsam aus der Klimakrise.

Warum Arbeiter*innen mehr zum Kampf gegen die Klimakrise beitragen können als Beatlefans

Demonstration gegen die ON in Paris.
Nächster Artikel

Paris 1973: Die Schlacht im Quartier Latin gegen Bullen und Faschisten